Skip to main content

Skin tones with Premiere/FCPX/Resolve

If you thought that adjusting simple things such as exposure, contrast or playing with curves would really behave in similar manner across different NLEs, well guess again.
I always thought that yellowish-greenish dark skin tones & magenta bright skin tones were (yet) another Sony quirk. Interestingly the image out of the camera was fine but as soon as I made a change in the Lumetri panel, skin would turn into this deadly color.  So while I was about to create an LUT to fix them I tested Resolve and FCPX and lo and behold I could not reproduce these awful tones!
What’s the deal then? After testing extensively these programs I found out that all three behave differently!
Resolve: gain changes all three channels with the same multiplicative factor. While that creates nice desaturated shadows, skin highlights have a problem since the red channel clips first and then green follows creating these yellowish hues.
FCPX: exposure is just an additive term on all three channels, so while you would not notice something funny with small changes, larger changes in shadows clip the blue & green channels first creating reddish shadows and larger changes in the highlights result in the same yellowish hues as in Resolve but to a smaller extent.
Premiere (Lumetri Color): Exposure tries to be smart with a heavily nonlinear response so highlights remain white. While highlights look indeed more white compared to Resolve & FCPX (maybe a bit magenta?) the problem is that during an exposure decrease the red channel is lowered apparently too fast and skin tones become yellow-green.
While exposure, contrast, curves in Lumetri color panel suffer from this, the classic old style Brightness & Contrast Effect in Premiere behaves the same as FCPX and adjusts levels by shifting all channels with an additive term. This results to better skin tones, so if you want to adjust contrast or reduce exposure in Premiere you should use this effect and avoid using the exposure/contrast/curves in Lumetri color panel. FCPX should only be used for very minor color correction if at all, although I could not test any plugins. Resolve if exposure or contrast is increased has the worse highlight clipping, but that can be easily remedied with the Brightness/Saturation curve. Add the selective slight desaturation of skin tones, and you have the best looking skin tones out of the bunch.
Here are the ungraded tests with only some exposure changes under natural light (artificial light makes the differences more obvious):





Long story short, if you want to achieve the best skin tones grade in Resolve. But I guess most of you already knew that right? :) 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

rec709 LUTs - Fuji color profiles

I did some quick reverse engineering of some of the Fuji profiles and created rec709 LUTs that can achieve similar results. No Fuji camera necessary and no need to shoot with a baked-in profile! Here is an example applied to a clip from A7rII: Long story short took advantage of the fact that Lightroom allows color profiles to be used with RAW files. Then I computed the three-dimensional affine transformation that can remap the default color space from adobe to any of the Fuji psrofiles. I can do a much better job if I find color samples that span most of the 3D space. For this I used 4 sample images from dpreview and imaging resource. The good thing is that I can use the program that I wrote to compute any transformation that is needed. For example S-log/s-gammut to rec709, or slog to clog, rec709Sony to rec709Fuji etc... I only need two images from the two profiles with the same color information such as a colorchecker and of course neutral WB an...

Lightroom & Skin tones

Many of you will call me crazy, but I got spoiled from the colors (especially the skintones) that I can get from my A7rii in video with the custom profiles. Still profiles in camera just do not have the same customization level as in the video. Even crazier was the fact that I could not get the stills to look as good with Lightroom, unless I spent a significant amount of time fine tuning all different color settings for each picture. While Lightroom offers plenty of controls to mess with color, it still does not give you the full control like 3D LUTs do (check this to see what I mean). Lightroom has some default camera profiles that you can use but none of them really look that good. For example with the A7rii the default Adobe Standard looks washed out and the Camera portrait has Sony's renowned green-yellow skin tones. Then I found out about the  DNG profile editor , which acts like an LUT editor for stills. It is quite straight fo...

eGPU for video processing on a laptop – Does it make sense?

I needed a portable solution that could also serve as my video editing station so I had to decide if a quad core with a dGPU is that important in my workflow. I did a small test with proxy generation in FCPX across MBP 15", MBP 13" & MB 12". It was with 3 XAVC-S 4K files with a total of 10min duration, located on an external USB3 hard drive: MBP 15" 2.7 455 2016        ~ 3.5 min MBP 13" 3.3 2016              ~ 4.5 min MB 12" m7 2016               ~ 15.5 min I knew the 12" throttled but after the test I realized how much it can affect performance. I was very impressed with the performance of the 13", it was much closer to the 15” than expected for a supposedly CPU heavy task.  The 13” would be a problem for Resolve though because it lacks a dGPU, but the eGPU solution looked promising so I got an AKiTiO Node to try...